• The home secretary announced that professionals who work with children will face criminal sanctions if they fail to report claims of child sexual abuse under a law to be introduced this year. Yvette Cooper promised to implement a key demand from Prof Alexis Jay’s child sexual abuse inquiry after Keir Starmer turned down demands from Elon Musk and Kemi Badenoch for a new investigation into paedophile gangs. The introduction of mandatory reporting in England would be included in the crime and policing bill expected to be introduced to parliament in the spring, Cooper told parliament.

• Cooper also disclosed that the government plans to introduce a victims and survivors panel to oversee reforms, make grooming an aggravating factor in child sexual offences and establish a core dataset for child abuse and protection.

• Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said the Tories will try to hold a Commons vote on holding a new inquiry into the child sexual abuse scandal. He said the party would do that by tabling an amendment to the children’s wellbeing and schools bill, which will get its second reading in the Commons on Wednesday.

• Keir Starmer said the online debate about child sexual exploitation is based on lies with politicians “jumping on the bandwagon simply to get attention” as he hit back at Elon Musk. The prime minister said a line had been crossed when the safeguarding minister, Jess Phillips, and others received serious threats as a result of the “poison of the far right”. Dtarmer also rejected calls for another review into the Oldham rape gang cases because he said the “utterly sickening” issue did not need any more consultations, it just needed action.

• Private hospitals will provide NHS patients in England with as many as a million extra appointments, scans and operations a year as part of the government’s drive to end the care backlog. Keir Starmer unveiled the NHS’s growing use of private healthcare in a major speech on Monday in which he set out his new elective reform plan to address a waiting list for planned care on which 6.4 million people are waiting for 7.5m treatments.

• Tulip Siddiq, the City and anti-corruption minister, has referred herself to the ministerial standards watchdog after days of allegations that she has lived in multiple properties tied to the ousted Bangladeshi government. Siddiq has asked Laurie Magnus, the prime minister’s independent adviser on ministerial standards, to investigate whether she might have broken the ministerial code. Her request came after it was revealed that Siddiq had lived in multiple properties linked to her aunt Sheikh Hasina, who recently resigned as Bangladesh’s prime minister after a popular uprising. Siddiq wrote to Magnus: “In recent weeks I have been the subject of media reporting, much of it inaccurate, about my financial affairs and my family’s links to the former government of Bangladesh. I am clear that I have done nothing wrong. However, for the avoidance of doubt, I would like you to independently establish the facts about these matters.”

• The Muslim Council of Britain accused Robert Jenrick of weaponising “the horrors suffered by young girls to push a hateful agenda” after the Tory politician described Britons of Pakistani origin as “people from alien cultures”. After it emerged that the government had refused Oldham council’s request to hold another national inquiry into failings over the offences of grooming gangs, Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, claimed in a lengthy tweet that their crimes had been “legalised and actively covered up to prevent disorder” because authorities were concerned about harming community relations. The MCB said Jenrick was “surpassing” Nigel Farage - who last year claimed a growing number of Muslims “do not subscribe to British values” - in his “targeting” of British Muslims.

• Wes Streeting, the health secretary, confirmed the decision to get Louise Casey to lead an independent commission on social care that was announced last week. He describes Casey as Whitehall’s best expert on getting things done.

In the Commons Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, also said the Tories will try to hold a Commons vote on holding a new inquiry into the child sexual abuse scandal. He said the party would do that by tabling an amendment to the children’s wellbeing and schools bill, which will get its second reading in the Commons on Wednesday.

That is all from me for today. Nadeem Badshah is now taking over.

Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, responded to Yvette Cooper’s statement in the Commons.

He claimed that last government was in the process of implementing the IICSA recommendations.

In an interview on Radio 4’s PM programme, David Lidington, who was de facto deputy PM when Theresa May was in Downing Street, said he wanted to see Tories defend Jess Phillips in response to Elon Musk’s claim that she was a “rape genocide apologist”. Lidington said:

I think it’s right that politicians left, right and centre in our democratic space should speak out very strongly when the sort of language, whether from Mr Musk or anybody else, comes close to putting at risk the safety of people who are exposing themselves to the democratic verdict in public life.

Frankly the reaction of any British political party to what Mr Musk said about Jess Phillips should be a mix of disgust, anger and contempt.

I would like to see leading members of my party come out to defend Jess Phillips, a Labour minister, against the sort of abuse she’s been getting. I think you can criticise her policies and her competency as a minister as much as you like, that’s perfectly fair game. But the sort of things we’ve had in recent days are despicable and should be rejected across the political spectrum.

In an interview on the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg yesterday, Philp said the bare minimum when asked to condemn Musk’s comment about Phillips. “The specific language used about Jess Phillips is not appropriate,” he said.

In his response to Cooper, Philp was marginally more robust. He said attempts to threaten or intimidate Phillips were “completely wrong”.

Cooper says IICSA also carried out a specific investigation into child sexual abuse by organised gangs. That reported in February 2022, she says.

Despite these different inquiries drawing up multiple recommendations, far too little has actually been done.

None of the 20 recommendations from the independent inquiry into child abuse have been implemented, as the Act on Independent Child Abuse Campaign group from the Survivors Trust has said this week.

She says two former Tory home secretaries said the IICSA report should be a watershed. But that did not happen, she says.

She says now “new impetus and action” is needed.

She announces that a new victim and survivors panel is being set up.

And she says she can announce action on three IICSA recommendations.

First, she confirms that a mandatory duty to report abuse will be included in the crime and policing bill.

Second, grooming will be made an aggravating factor in child sexual offences.

And, third, a core dataset will be established for child abuse and protection, she says.

UPDATE: Rajeev Syal has the full story here.

The Muslim Council of Britain has accused Robert Jenrick of weaponising “the horrors suffered by young girls to push a hateful agenda” after the Tory politician described Britons of Pakistani origin as “people from alien cultures”.

After it emerged that the government had refused Oldham council’s request to hold another national inquiry into failings over the offences of grooming gangs, Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, claimed in a lengthy tweet on Saturday that their crimes had been “legalised and actively covered up to prevent disorder” because authorities were concerned about harming community relations. He said:

This appalling affair is the final nail in the coffin for liberals who still cling to the argument that Britain is an integration success story. The scandal started with the onset of mass migration. Importing hundreds of thousands of people from alien cultures, who possess medieval attitudes towards women, brought us here.

In a statement to the Guardian, the Muslim Council of Britain, which represents over 500 affiliated mosques and community associations, said Jenrick was “surpassing” Nigel Farage - who last year claimed a growing number of Muslims “do not subscribe to British values” - in his “targeting” of British Muslims.

A spokesperson said:

Robert Jenrick is pouring petrol on social divisions with rhetoric that grows more inflammatory by the day - surpassing even Farage in his targeting of British Muslims and their faith. His dangerous language about ‘alien cultures’ isn’t just divisive - it’s matches in a tinderbox.

It is sickening that Jenrick chooses to weaponise the horrors suffered by young girls to push a hateful, anti-immigrant agenda, with hate crimes against Muslim communities sharply rising since last year.

We have written to the Conservative party to urge action. Yet, like their overall approach to Muslims and the hatred Muslims face, no response has been forthcoming. The Conservative party’s silence speaks volumes, and political leaders across all parties must unite to ensure such extremist rhetoric finds no place in British public life.

Wes Streeting, the health secretary, is making his Commons statement now. He is confirming the decision to get Louise Casey to lead an independent commission on social care that was announced last week. He describes Casey as Whitehall’s best expert on getting things done.

He also sums up the measures announced by Keir Starmer this morning to cut hospital waiting lists in England. (See 3.43pm.)

The full text of Keir Starmer’s speech on new measures to cut NHS waiting lists is now on the Downing Street website.

The elective care reform plan has been published here.

Here is a news release about how the NHS app is being upgraded to “enable patients to choose providers, book appointments in more settings and receive test results, all in one place”.

And here is a news release about the “NHS and Independent Sector Partnership Agreement” announced today that will allow more NHS opertations to be carried out in private hospitals.

The Green party has suggested that this deal could lead to '“backdoor privatisation”. In a statement, Adrian Ramsay, the Green party’s co-leader, said:

The Green party has long argued for a shift towards community focused health provision, and this approach is welcome. However, Keir Starmer is now talking about a “new agreement” to expand the relationship between the NHS and the private healthcare sector. We need clarity on exactly what this means for the long term as we do not need more backdoor privatisation.

It is vital that NHS capacity is built up, and that the promised community diagnostic centres and surgical hubs are publicly run and GPs properly resourced to see their patients. We also need restored budgets for public health and clear long-term funding commitments for hospital trusts, so that they can better plan to deliver better care for us all.

The Green party has always proudly defended the NHS against creeping privatisation. We are committed to a fully public health service and to keeping the profit motive well away from our NHS.

Elon Musk started attacking the former Labour PM Gordon Brown over the grooming gangs scandal this morning. In one post, he quoted someone claiming that Brown sent a letter to police forces telling them not to get involved.

A spokesperson for Brown said this was a “complete fabrication”. The spokesperson:

There is no basis for such allegations at all. They are a complete fabrication. There is no foundation whatsoever for alleging that Mr Brown sent, approved or was in any way involved with issuing a circular or statement to the police because it did not happen.

The original source of this allegations has expressly accepted Mr Brown was not involved at all. Moreover, there is no evidence that such words or actions now attributed to him by Elon Musk have ever been used by Mr Brown, because he neither said nor did them.

When it comes to the exploitation and abuse of children and young women by sex grooming gangs, the priority for all people in public life should be to secure justice for the survivors, punishment for the perpetrators, and action at local and national level to ensure that these kind of horrific crimes can never be allowed to happen again.

But that collective endeavour is undermined when some individuals and media outlets instead propagate outright lies about the reasons that these crimes happened in the past.

Kemi Badenoch has accused Keir Starmer of using “smear tactics” against her.

Ignoring the conventional PR wisdom that it is a mistake to publicise attacks from opponents, she has responded to Starmer in a post on social media including a clip from his Q&A earlier.

Starmer is applying Labour smear tactics from 20 years ago and thinks they will work today. He is a man of the past with no answers for today’s problems, let alone tomorrow’s.

That such a huge scandal could occur should prompt soul-searching not ranting that those of us who care about it are “the far-right”.

As I said earlier, if you read Starmer’s quotes in full (see 10.39am and 10.57am), it is clear that he was not saying that anyone concerned about gang-rape is on the far right. He was referring to the way far-right provocateurs like Elon Musk and Tommy Robinson have exploited this issue, and criticising Conservatives who have aligned themselves with their position, by for example not condemning Musk’s comments about Jess Phillips.

Elon Musk is still attacking the government over the child abuse scandals on X. In an interview on the World at One, Wes Streeting, the health secretary, was asked to respond to one recent message, where Musk said:

Starmer was deeply complicit in the mass rapes in exchange for votes.

That’s what the inquiry would show.

Streeting said that he thought Keir Starmer was “brilliant” at dealing with this issue during his Q&A this morning. He said Starmer and Jess Phillips, the safeguarding minister, were people who devoted their professional lives, before they entered politics, to protecting victims and keeping women and girls safe from violence. Musk should have a “social media detox”, he said.

Echoing what Starmer said this morning (see 11.59am), Streeting said that Tory response to the Musk attack on Phillips had been a mixture of “silent indifference from the more decent Conservatives and, worse still, active complicity from other Conservatives”. Streeting said the “decent Conservative party” that used to operate in the country should be speaking up.

Asked if he thought the government should stop using X (which is something the Guardian, at a corporate level, decided to do in November), Streeting defended the decision to keep using it – but implied that he would be happy if No 10 were to order a boycott. He said:

We want to get our message across, on our terms, to the public where they are. And that is why I’ve been criticised myself over the years and for talking to newspapers or broadcasters that are hostile to the Labour party and centre-left views.

If you don’t set out your own views on your own terms, people don’t hear them on your terms.

On something like a cross-government approach or a Labour party approach, ultimately, I think that’s the decision for the leader of my party and the leader of the government. So long as the prime minister, the leader of my party, is happy for us to continue posting on X, I will continue to do so.

The moment he takes a decision otherwise, I would absolutely go along with that.

Ed Davey, the Lib Dem leader, has said the US ambassador should be summoned to the Foreign Office to explain why a Trump ally is calling for the government to be overthrown. Referring to a tweet from Elon Musk this morning (see 9.54am), Davey posted these on social media.

People have had enough of Elon Musk interfering with our country’s democracy when he clearly knows nothing about Britain.

It’s time to summon the US ambassador to ask why an incoming US official is suggesting the UK government should be overthrown.

This dangerous and irresponsible rhetoric is further proof that the UK can’t rely on the Trump administration.

It’s in our national interest to rebuild trade and security ties with our allies in Europe.

In a post on social media, Harry Cole, the Sun’s political editor, claimed that Keir Starmer comments during his Q&A this morning (see 10.39am) meant he was saying “normal Brits” worried about rape gangs were part of the far right.

That’s a fairly extreme interpretation of what Starmer was saying. If you read the quotes in full (see 10.39am and 10.57am), it is clear that by “far right” he was referring to Elon Musk, Tommy Robinson and the sort of people who have been backing their comments about Jess Phillips. To most observers it would have been obvious that he was not applying the term to anyone opposed to child rape.

But the Tories are going with the Harry Cole interpretation. About two hours after Cole posted his message on X, CCHQ released this statement from Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary. Philp said:

It is disgraceful that Keir Starmer is smearing people who are concerned about rape gangs as jumping on a “far right” bandwagon, rather than facing up to his own record on this and reconsidering his refusal as prime minister to hold a full national inquiry.

As Kemi Badenoch said yesterday, a new inquiry must go beyond previous inquiries and focus specifically on the institutional and political failings that enabled the systematic and barbaric attacks to take place.

If Keir Starmer can’t see why people across the UK are keen to have these questions answered and proper accountability for the victims of this heinous scandal, it just shows how out of touch he really is.

Not all the questions about the Starmer Q&A were about Elon Musk. Kate McCann from Times Radio pointed out that, while Starmer was saying there was no need for any more inquiries into child sexual abuse (see 11.15am), he has just ordered a fresh review of social care – even though this is another topic covered by numerous reports over recent years. The final report is not due until 2028. McCann asked if Starmer would bring this date forward, given that he has already said there is an urgent need for reform.

In response, Starmer said a new review was needed because “we’ve got to get it right”. He said:

Social care is such an important issue in its own right, and obviously it’s also linked to the question of what happens in our hospitals, because it’s got a huge impact. We’ve got to get it right, which is why we put Louise Casey in charge of this who’s renowned for coming out with really good, strong recommendations.

And I want to build a consensus. I genuinely want to cross-party consensus, because if this is going to work and make a material difference, it’s got to last different through different parliaments. That will take time to get this right. But we’re determined to do it.

But Starmer said that he did not want to leave all reform until 2028. The Casey review will report in two stages, Starmer pointed out, and he said he wanted to make progress on issues like a fair pay agreement more quickly.

During the Q&A after his speech Jack Elsom from the Sun had a second try at that question asked by Christopher Hope. (See 11.15am.) Was Starmer refusing to hold another inquiry into child abuse cases because he was satisfied there were “no more failings of wider state that need to come to light”.

In his response, Starmer said he thought people do now understand what the problem was. In fact, he specificially changed CPS policy in these cases when was DPP because he feared “warped ideas about community relations” were holding back prosecutions.

Well, I don’t think we should leave any stone unturned, but I think we know what the basic failings were. The reason I brought the first mass prosecution for an Asian grooming gang is precisely because I could see that these warped ideas about community relations were possibly having an impact, because I could precisely see that the myths and stereotypes about the victims were preventing some of the most vulnerable in our society from the protection they needed. That action was taken over a decade ago.

Yes, of course, you’re right to challenge, to say ‘Couldn’t there be something else?’

But the basic problem here is pretty well known. It was pretty obvious. That’s why I did what I did in the Crown Prosecution Service, because I could see what the problem was.

During the Q&A after his speech Keir Starmer was asked if he saw Elon Musk’s comments as a direct attack on him from the Trump administration, and if he would be asking Donald Trump to get Musk to “tone it down” when they met. (Starmer is expected to fly to Washington to see Trump fairly soon after the inauguration.)

In his reply, Starmer said he did not want to “individualise this to Elon Musk, or anyone else”. But then he, in effect, did make this about Kemi Badenoch, because he went on to attack the Conservatives again. He said:

I’m very concerned about where the Tory party is going on this, in this country …

I think only a few months ago it would have been unthinkable for things to be said about Jess Phillips that were said recently [Musk calling her a “rape genocide apologist”] without all political parties, and the leader of the opposition, calling it out in terms.

I genuinely believe that. I don’t think it was that long ago that you would have all expected that reaction. You’d have all been challenging the leader of the opposition, ‘Will you denounce this? This isn’t fair, because it’s put a member of parliament, my member of parliament, at risk.’

That’s not good. That’s why I say a line’s been crossed.

So this isn’t about America or Musk. I’m talking about our politics. I’m talking about the responsibility that our politicians have in calling this out for what it is, and distancing themselves and condemning it.

Because if you’re not stand prepared to stand up as a Tory MP and denounce what’s been said about Jess Phillips, who’s now had threats made to her, then you need to seriously consider while you’re in politics in the first place.

Badenoch, and the Conservative party, have backed calls for an new inquiry into child sexual exploitation, and Badenoch published an article in the Mail on Sunday yesterday explaining why. In a post on X, Musk responded: “Good on Kemi Badenoch!”

Badenoch has not endorsed what Musk said about Phillips on Friday last week. But she has not criticised it publicly either, and yesterday in a post on social media she defended Robert Jenrick after he was accused of making inflammatory comments on race. “We MUST be free to have tough conversations, no matter how difficult that may be to hear,” she said.

Tulip Siddiq, the Treasury minister, has referred herself to the independent adviser on ministerial standards over reports that she was given a London flat by a person linked to her aunt, the former Bangladeshi prime minister Sheikh Hasina.

Asked about the story at his Q&A, Keir Starmer said:

Tulip Siddiq has acted entirely properly by referring herself to the independent adviser, as she’s now done, and that’s why we brought into being the new code.

It’s to allow ministers to ask the adviser to establish the facts, and, yes, I’ve got confidence in her, and that’s the process that will now be happening.

Siddiq said she had “done nothing wrong” in her letter to Sir Laurie Magnus, the independent adviser on ministerial standards (aka the PM’s “ethics adviser”. She said:

In recent weeks I have been the subject of media reporting, much of it inaccurate, about my financial affairs and my family’s links to the former government of Bangladesh.

I am clear that I have done nothing wrong.

However, for the avoidance of doubt, I would like you to independently establish the facts about these matters.

I will obviously ensure you have all the information you need to do this.

As well as being asked to explain the flat, Siddiq has also faced claims, which she has denied, that she is implicated in a corruption scandal being investigated in Bangladesh.

As PA Media reports, Siddiq had been due to join a Treasury delegation heading to China this week, but will now stay in the UK. A source said: “Tulip wants to be the UK so she is available to assist the independent adviser on ministerial standards.”

GB News is more sympathetic to rightwing causes than any other broadcaster and it has been running a lot of stories about calls for an inquiry into the Oldham rape gang cases. Christopher Hope, its political editor, suggested the grooming gangs issue was not fully covered in the final report from the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse. He asked Starmer if he could be certain this was not still happening today, and he asked if he was worried that a new inquiry might reveal his failings as DPP. ‘That’s why Elon Musk says, were you complicit in the rape of Britain”. Hope claimed that just going after the far right was not an adequate response.

In response, Starmer said that Hope had covered what he did as DPP when he was a journalist at the Telegraph. He went on:

You looked at my record for five years as I was doing the job. You got access to all of the materials … I’ve set out what I did. I actually changed the system, because I could see some of the things that were going wrong.

Starmer said the victims suffered “sickening abuse” and were not listened to. That is why he changed the way the CPS dealt with these cases. And it was partly why he went into politics, he said.

On the question of this call for an ever increasing number of reviews, there have been a lot of reviews, including localised reviews, including into Oldham – for example, the mayor of Manchester did his review. And the Jay report was intended to look at the different types of exploitation that went on. It was a comprehensive review.

What Professor Jay said was really important there [see 9.44am], because I completely agree. This doesn’t need more consultation, it doesn’t need more research, it just needs action. There have been many, many reviews … frankly, it’s time for action.

The next question came form Robert Peston from ITV News. He said Elon Musk had said Starmer should be in prison. That was libellous. Would Starmer sue?

Starmer did not address the libel question (he won’t sue, because that would be madness), but he again defended his record. He said:

There’s nothing secret about being director of public prosections. Every single case I prosecuted went to court, was looked at by a judge. I have an independent inspectorate, access to every single file of every case, any time he or she wanted. And I was overseen by the attorney general, which for three of the five years was a Tory attorney general.

So … rather than me trying to say any more about what I did when I was in office, you can access this material. You know where it is, you know what facts are …

Once we lose the anchor that truth matters, in the robust debate that we must have, then we are on a very slippery slope.

And when politicians, and I mean politicians who sat in government for many years, are casual about honesty, decency, truth and the rule of law, calling for inquiries because they want to jump on a bandwagon of the far right, that affects politics because a robust debate can only be based on the true facts.

And that’s why this is actually an important point about our politics, not about what anybody may or may not say on Twitter. That actually isn’t the main issue.

The main issue is, what are politicians here doing to stand up for the things that matter to our democracy?

That’s why I want to call this out, because I think it really matters, and it matters not just to me, not just to the Labour party. It ought to matter, and it used to matter to all political parties, and it’s a sign of where the Tory party have got to that we’re even having this debate.

Beth Rigby, the Sky News political editor, also asks about Elon Musk, and about his attacks on Jess Phillips, the safeguarding minister.

Starmer says that he thinks most people are more interested in the NHS “than what’s happening on Twitter”.

But he says he does want to address in detail this issue.

Let me start with this, child sexual exploitation is utterly sickening, utterly sickening.

And for many, many years, too many victims have been completely let down, let down by perverse ideas about community relations or by the idea that institutions must be protected above all else. And they’ve not been listened to, and they’ve not been heard.

And when I was chief prosecutor for five years, I tackled that head on, because I could see what was happening, and that’s why I reopened cases that have been closed and supposedly finished. I brought the first major prosecution of an Asian grooming gang in the particular case – it was in Rochdale, but it was the first of its kind …

We changed, or I changed, the whole prosecution approach, because I wanted to challenge, and did challenge the myths and stereotypes that were stopping those victims being heard.

So we changed the entire approach, not without criticism at the time, I might add.

But when I left office, we had the highest number of child sexual abuse cases being prosecuted on record.

Now that record is not secret as a public servant, it’s all it’s there for all of you or everybody to see.

I also called for mandatory reporting of child sexual abuse. I’ve called for that decade ago. The Tories did nothing about that, for those 10 long years, including when the Jay report came out.

Having defended his record as DPP, Starmer goes on to attack those who have criticised him and Jess Phillips. He does not name Elon Musk, but he is clearly referring to him. Towards the end he also explicitly attacks the Tories, who have joined Musk in calling for an inquiry into the Oldham rape gangs. He says.

Those that are spreading lies and misinformation as far and as wide as possible, they’re not interested in victims. They’re interested in themselves.

Those who are cheerleading Tommy Robinson are not interested in justice. They’re supporting a man who went to prison for nearly collapsing a grooming case, a gang grooming case. These are people are trying to get some kind of vicarious thrill from street violence that people like Tommy Robinson promote.

And those attacking Jess Phillips, who I’m proud to call a colleague and a friend on protecting victims - Jess Phillips has done 1,000 times more than they’ve even dreamt about when it comes to protecting victims of sexual abuse throughout her entire career …

We’ve seen this playbook many times, whipping up of intimidation and threats of violence, hoping that the media will amplify it.

Jess Phillips does not need me or anybody else to speak on her behalf. But when the poison of the far right leads to serious threats to Jess Phillips and others, that in my book [means] a line has been crossed.

I enjoy the cut and thrust of politics, the robust debate that we must have, but that’s got to be based on facts and truth, not on lies, not on those who are so desperate for attention that they’re prepared to debase themselves and their country.

So this government will get on with the job of protecting victims, including child sexual abuse, mandatory reporting, accelerating the processes.

But what I won’t tolerate is this discussion based on lies without calling it out. What I won’t tolerate is politicians jumping on the bandwagon simply to get attention when those politicians sat in government for 14 long years, tweeting, talking, but not doing anything about it – now so desperate for attention that they’re amplifying what the far right is saying.

So that’s what I say about Jess Phillips, Thank you.

Starmer is now taking questions.

Q: [From Hugh Pym, the BBC’s health editor] By focusing on cutting waiting lists, are you downgrading other health targets. And will A&E lose out?

Starmer says just because the NHS is prioritising waiting lists, that does not mean other areas are being neglected. “We can walk and chew gum,” he says.

Q: What do you think of Elon Musk calling for the tyrannical UK goverment to be overthrown? [See 9.54am.]

Starmer replies simply:

In relation to that, I don’t really have any comment on the particular comment that was made this morning by Musk.

Keir Starmer is delivering his speech about the elective reform plan now.

Here is the Downing Street news release sent out overnight previewing what he is announcing.

The Conservative party and Reform UK have both been calling for a public inquiry into the Oldham child abuse scandal. They have been saying this in response to a report last week saying the government had rejected a request from Oldham council for a national inquiry. Given that there have been other inquiries into what happened in Oldham, as well as a seven-year, all-encompassing inquiry into child abuse in Britain, the case for a new inquiry might seem weak. But the story has attracted a lot of attention in part because Elon Musk has been endlessly posting inflammatory tweets about this on X.

Prof Alexis Jay, who chaired the national child abuse inquiry, has not backed calls for a new inquiry into what happened at Oldham. As the BBC reports, in a statement she has instead called for the “full implementation” of the recommendations she set out in her own report. She says:

Our mission is not to call for new inquiries but to advocate for the full implementation of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse’s recommendations. A child protection authority is critical to this process.

Labour say it will implement the recommendations from the 2022 report “at pace”. In a statement yesterday the party said:

The Conservatives spent years dragging their feet and failing to implement the recommendations in Prof Jay’s report, which they praised for its thoroughness. The hypocrisy of Tory politicians is shameful and disrespects the victims of these vile crimes.

Now is the time for action and delivery. This Labour government will act at pace to implement the Jay recommendations to protect young girls from horrific sexual abuse. We will protect women and girls where the Tories failed.

Good morning. Prime ministers like to focus on what they think is important and there are few issues more important in the UK than the state of the NHS. On his first proper day back at work after the Christmas holidays, Keir Starmer is giving a speech on this, and Andrew Gregory has previewed it here.

I’ll be covering the speech, and reaction to it, in detail as the day goes on.

But prime ministers also have to communicate via the media, and for years they have had to deal with the fact that that British papers have their own agenda, and are largely hostile to Labour governments. Social media is even worse. And that is why Starmer is expected to find his post-speech Q&A dominated by questions about a child abuse scandal from about 20 years ago.

Part of the coverage has been driven by false and absurd claims about Starmer and Jess Phillips, the safeguarding minister. Politicians, and journalists, normally work on the basis that they can ignore loudmouth idiots and that they should only pay attention to figures of authority. But, with Donald Trump about to become US president again, what happens if the figure of authority is also a loudmouth idiot – or at least presents as one? The current Oldham rape gang controversy has been stirred up by tweets from Elon Musk, the tech billionaire and leading Trump ally, but it is an early indication of some of the problems Trump’s social media outbursts are likely to cause when he returns to the White House.

Over recent weeks Downing Street has generally said little or nothing about Musk many inflammatory comments about Starmer on X, the social media platform he owns. Other ministers have stuck to the same line, although at the weekend Wes Streeting, the health secretary, described Musk’s attack on Phillips as “appalling”. (Whether this was encouraged by No 10, or just freelance retaliation, was not clear.)

Today Starmer himself is expected to hit back, not so much by attacking Musk personally, as by defending his own record dealing with child abuse cases when he was director of public prosecutions. In a report in the Times, Steven Swinford says:

The prime minister is expected to respond to [Musk’s claim that he was “complict in the rape of Britain”] on Monday as he holds a major press conference about his plans to cut NHS waiting lists. He is expected to say that he gave the “green light” to prosecuting paedophile gangs in Rochdale in 2013 and highlight the fact he introduced reforms to the way the Crown Prosecution Service handles child abuse cases. He also introduced a national network of specialist prosecutors to look into child abuse and sexual exploitation.

The prime minister is also likely to issue a forthright defence of Phillips and the work she has done in tackling violence against women and girls. Both Labour and the Tories have said that Musk’s comments about Phillips are inaccurate.

Chris Mason, the BBC’s political editor, has had a similar briefing. Speaking on the Today programme this morning, he said he expected Starmer to say that the debate about how child abuse cases were handled should be “grounded in verifiable facts”.

We’ll hear Starmer’s own words soon. Here is the agenda for the day.

10am: Keir Starmer delivers his speech on the elective reform plan, the proposals to ensure the NHS in England hits its target of ensuring that by 2029 92% of patients don’t have to wait more than 18 weeks for an operation. But he is also taking questions from the media, and is expected to be asked about a range of issues that have been in the news over the holiday period.

2.30pm: John Healey, the defence secretary, takes questions in the Commons.

After 3.30pm: MPs debate a backbench motion calling for the government to investigate ways of seizing frozen Russian assets in the UK and using them to fund Ukraine.

4.30pm: MPs hold a debate in Westminster Hall on the petition saying there should be a fresh general election.

If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.

If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.

I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.